Difference between revisions of "Talk:Light Gods"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Whether or not Michael wants to accept Chaldan <i>now</i>, the Hyrulians of old worshipped him, and thus he's worth a mention. It'd be like ignoring "Tauroch" just because modern Ticonderans are atheists for the most part. --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 12:43, 6 September 2006 (CDT) | Whether or not Michael wants to accept Chaldan <i>now</i>, the Hyrulians of old worshipped him, and thus he's worth a mention. It'd be like ignoring "Tauroch" just because modern Ticonderans are atheists for the most part. --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 12:43, 6 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm with Aurora on this one. Chaldan's part of the history of Hyrule. Since he ws last mentioned in story around twenty story years ago there's plenty of time for it to not be part of modern Hyland, so he has plenty of flexibility in this matter. --[[User:Celiose|Celiose]] 18:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 6 September 2006
Whether or not Michael wants to accept Chaldan now, the Hyrulians of old worshipped him, and thus he's worth a mention. It'd be like ignoring "Tauroch" just because modern Ticonderans are atheists for the most part. --Aurora 12:43, 6 September 2006 (CDT)
I'm with Aurora on this one. Chaldan's part of the history of Hyrule. Since he ws last mentioned in story around twenty story years ago there's plenty of time for it to not be part of modern Hyland, so he has plenty of flexibility in this matter. --Celiose 18:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT)
