Talk:Light Gods

Whether or not Michael wants to accept Chaldan now, the Hyrulians of old worshipped him, and thus he's worth a mention. It'd be like ignoring "Tauroch" just because modern Ticonderans are atheists for the most part. --Aurora 12:43, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

I'm with Aurora on this one. Chaldan's part of the history of Hyrule. Since he ws last mentioned in story around twenty story years ago there's plenty of time for it to not be part of modern Hyland, so he has plenty of flexibility in this matter. --Celiose 18:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

Wow. ... Yeah, I'm with Aurora on this one too. This is almost as bad as when someone called you "bossy" in the Kupopolis (story) article. Aurora, I'm sorry our group is treating your stuff like shit right now. This is not supposed to be what Kupopolis is about. --Scen 23:42, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

Right now? This is a sudden change? Really? I guess this must be all my doing, right? Certainly has nothing to do with a decade of story evolution. --Xstryker 09:48, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Yes, right now. Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I don't think it's cool to disrespect a writer who is currently in the story by basically telling them their stuff is no longer relevent. How would you feel if, after you came back from when you quit writing in Kupopolis, and someone said to you that Dain Kordridge only existed of Ticondera's hypothetical current writer decided they wanted to aknowledge him? It would be rude, hurtful and completely not right at all, because we aren't supposed to do that to people in Kupopolis. So I do think you owe Aurora an apology, and if there is an issue with Chaldan it should be handled between Mike and Aurora off the wiki. --Scen 11:16, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

You're equating Dain Kordridge to Chaldan? I didn't realize Chaldan was such a major character. If so, I apologize immediately. --Xstryker 11:24, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

... Amazing. Just... wow. I'm speechless. Me, speechless. That's a new low. --Scen 11:35, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Did I go too far in suggesting Dain Kordridge was a major character? Or is there no difference between major characters and minor ones? Or (since I've never read a post about Chaldan), is there something I'm just not getting here?--Xstryker 11:48, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Sweet crap, tone it down, you two. Clearly, Chaldan is not a major character (and equating Dain with Chaldan is silly... but frankly, Dain hasn't seen much love in the past... ohh... 5-6 years, so this is kinda a cripple fight to begin with). But I know better than most what it feels like to come back and have the things you've written about swept away... not simply lessened due to natural story evolution, but completely swept away. And it's not cool. Each writer, within the etiquette of the IS community, more or less has dominion over their stuff. --Nick 12:08, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Let me be frank here. If I took a ten year hiatus, I'd be fine with anything anyone did in my absence, especially if there was no way for them to even contact me. I'd probably be even more fine with it if it involved changing stuff I wrote in high school. When I took a two year hiatus, I explicitly gave Ticondera to Travis to do whatever he wanted, because I trusted his judgment. If he had taken that opportunity to retcon stuff, and still allowed me to get Ticondera back when I returned, I'd have taken what he wrote and expanded things from there. I think Mike's done good work with the Hyland Republic. Aurora's done great work since her return, as well.--Xstryker 12:06, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Honestly, before this debate goes any further, I'd like to know something. Is anyone challenging my Torak->Tauroch change? What role Chaldan plays in Hyland history is kind of just a minor detail to me. I'm honestly more interesting in defending my own work. --Xstryker 12:06, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Well, firstly, I don't think there's anything to "tone down," and I don't even think there's a debate here. I was, frankly, literally stunned speechless by Adam's response earlier, because it did seem rather callous and unconcerned with the fact that Aurora really felt snubbed by the comment Adam attached to the creation of this article.

Also, I don't think the comparison between Dain and Chaldan is at issue here. You could just as easily put another Ticonderan asset there, perhaps of equal or lesser value, and it would not significantly change my point. My point was: our golden rule is supposed to be "respect other writers," and I didn't find the treatment Aurora and Chaldan have been getting as especially respectful. As hot-under-the-collar as I get sometimes, I always try my best not to outright diss other writers and their work in the story, and I think in general we do a pretty good job of keeping our ego-borne spats outside of the realm of story content. But, Adam, honestly, your reply kind of struck me as you saying "You DARE presume to compare pitiful Chaldan to the GLORY that is Major Character Dain Kordridge!?" I don't think you meant it that way, but it was part of the reason I was kind of too shocked to reply.

Anyway, I'm not going to go on any longer. I'm not here to argue (this time!). I just think somebody's done somebody wrong a little bit, that's all. --Scen 12:40, 7 September 2006 (CDT)