Difference between revisions of "Talk:Moogle"

From Kupopowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Moogle Interfertility)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
ew tmi
 
ew tmi
 
--[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 14:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
 
--[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 14:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
I'm sorry, but who would hump a moogle? That's kinda a little ''too'' out there. --[[User:Michael|Michael]] 01:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
+
*I'm sorry, but who would hump a moogle? That's kinda a little ''too'' out there. --[[User:Michael|Michael]] 01:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
**probably someone doing a google search for "Mog XXX" ;-) --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 07:44, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
*Point of grammar: shouldn't it be "Moogle Fertility"? Moogle Infertility would imply that they are unable to have children with humans. --[[User:Celiose|Celiose]] 12:56, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
**You skipped a syllable, Travis  :-p  It's in'''ter'''fertility. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 13:35, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
*Why can't we just say it was magic like what mommy and daddy told me about the birds and the bees? --[[User:Michael|Michael]] 14:26, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
**I'm with you on that one, Mike. --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 14:33, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
***For the record: All I wrote was that moogles and humans are cross-fertile, a statement which is supported by in-story precedent. I'm not responsible for the places Adam and Mike chose to take that statement within their own twisted little minds. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 15:27, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
****mang they didn't take it anywhere. the article says moogles and humans can have offspring. that's just fucken gross. i'm kind of glad i missed the "in-story precedent" --[[User:JD|JD]] 01:05, 2 September 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 06:05, 2 September 2006

Moogle Interfertility

ew tmi --Xstryker 14:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT)

  • I'm sorry, but who would hump a moogle? That's kinda a little too out there. --Michael 01:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
    • probably someone doing a google search for "Mog XXX" ;-) --Xstryker 07:44, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
  • Point of grammar: shouldn't it be "Moogle Fertility"? Moogle Infertility would imply that they are unable to have children with humans. --Celiose 12:56, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
    • You skipped a syllable, Travis  :-p It's interfertility. --Scen 13:35, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
  • Why can't we just say it was magic like what mommy and daddy told me about the birds and the bees? --Michael 14:26, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
    • I'm with you on that one, Mike. --Xstryker 14:33, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
      • For the record: All I wrote was that moogles and humans are cross-fertile, a statement which is supported by in-story precedent. I'm not responsible for the places Adam and Mike chose to take that statement within their own twisted little minds. --Scen 15:27, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
        • mang they didn't take it anywhere. the article says moogles and humans can have offspring. that's just fucken gross. i'm kind of glad i missed the "in-story precedent" --JD 01:05, 2 September 2006 (CDT)