Talk:Xsian
I wonder: for the purposes of this wiki, should we really be describing certain story elements according to their real-world equivalents? It kinda strikes me as an OOC aside in this entry, and if you remove the stuff about "Korean, Japanese," etc., I think people would still get the idea from the story elements you've listed below. Just a thought. Because the wiki must stay PURE!!! --Nick 08:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- "Because the wiki must stay PURE!!!" qft --Scen 08:26, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- You could put it in a Meta section at the bottom. --Xstryker 12:39, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- Because the wiki must stay USEFUL!!! --Xstryker 12:40, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- I like that idea, the Meta section at the bottom. Travis? --Nick 13:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- Okay, I really don't like the meta in a story article. I'm going to extricate the OOC references. The wiki can be useful without breaking character. --Scen 17:59, 14 August 2006 (CDT)
- So what you're saying is Bekkler actually does like poopies, in character? Terrorfying!! --JD 18:04, 14 August 2006 (CDT)
- Okay, I really don't like the meta in a story article. I'm going to extricate the OOC references. The wiki can be useful without breaking character. --Scen 17:59, 14 August 2006 (CDT)
In all seriousness I don't really think that the references to korean and japanese really fit, either. Of course, it's Travis' article. So while I'd rather those references be pulled altogether (FOR THE GOOD OF THE WIKI) I think it's up to him. Unless we all can get together and decide what the "rules" are regarding references like that. --JD 18:10, 14 August 2006 (CDT)
WOW THIS MUST BE AN IMPORTANT SUBJECT I CANT STOP POSTING ABOUT IT. I think this could use some straightening up: "but we tend to play around whoever we want" because I don't really know what it means. And since I totally read at a third grade level I probably know what I'm talking about. No shit, srsly. --JD 18:12, 14 August 2006 (CDT)
