Talk:Light Gods

Whether or not Michael wants to accept Chaldan now, the Hyrulians of old worshipped him, and thus he's worth a mention. It'd be like ignoring "Tauroch" just because modern Ticonderans are atheists for the most part. --Aurora 12:43, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

I'm with Aurora on this one. Chaldan's part of the history of Hyrule. Since he ws last mentioned in story around twenty story years ago there's plenty of time for it to not be part of modern Hyland, so he has plenty of flexibility in this matter. --Celiose 18:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

Wow. ... Yeah, I'm with Aurora on this one too. This is almost as bad as when someone called you "bossy" in the Kupopolis (story) article. Aurora, I'm sorry our group is treating your stuff like shit right now. This is not supposed to be what Kupopolis is about. --Scen 23:42, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

Right now? This is a sudden change? Really? I guess this must be all my doing, right? Certainly has nothing to do with a decade of story evolution. --Xstryker 09:48, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Yes, right now. Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I don't think it's cool to disrespect a writer who is currently in the story by basically telling them their stuff is no longer relevent. How would you feel if, after you came back from when you quit writing in Kupopolis, and someone said to you that Dain Kordridge only existed of Ticondera's hypothetical current writer decided they wanted to aknowledge him? It would be rude, hurtful and completely not right at all, because we aren't supposed to do that to people in Kupopolis. So I do think you owe Aurora an apology, and if there is an issue with Chaldan it should be handled between Mike and Aurora off the wiki. --Scen 11:16, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

You're equating Dain Kordridge to Chaldan? I didn't realize Chaldan was such a major character. If so, I apologize immediately. --Xstryker 11:24, 7 September 2006 (CDT)