Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kupopolis (story)"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I vote that the Kupopolis (story) and kupopolis: introduction be rolled into one another at some point. It seems redundant. I feel like there should be a "introduction" heading and a "background" heading, so that both "whats" of the story are covered at once. (What it's about and what it was/is in a meta-story sense) --[[User:JD|JD]] 16:02, 3 August 2006 (CDT) | I vote that the Kupopolis (story) and kupopolis: introduction be rolled into one another at some point. It seems redundant. I feel like there should be a "introduction" heading and a "background" heading, so that both "whats" of the story are covered at once. (What it's about and what it was/is in a meta-story sense) --[[User:JD|JD]] 16:02, 3 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Fine by me, I was kinda wondering why there were two different Kupopolis (story) articles planned anyway. [[User:Scen|Scen]] 16:22, 3 August 2006 (CDT) | :Fine by me, I was kinda wondering why there were two different Kupopolis (story) articles planned anyway. [[User:Scen|Scen]] 16:22, 3 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I'm behind this, myself. --[[User:Tex|Tex]] 18:30, 3 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:30, 3 August 2006
I vote that the Kupopolis (story) and kupopolis: introduction be rolled into one another at some point. It seems redundant. I feel like there should be a "introduction" heading and a "background" heading, so that both "whats" of the story are covered at once. (What it's about and what it was/is in a meta-story sense) --JD 16:02, 3 August 2006 (CDT)
- Fine by me, I was kinda wondering why there were two different Kupopolis (story) articles planned anyway. Scen 16:22, 3 August 2006 (CDT)
- I'm behind this, myself. --Tex 18:30, 3 August 2006 (CDT)
