Difference between revisions of "Talk:Moogle"
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*I'm sorry, but who would hump a moogle? That's kinda a little ''too'' out there. --[[User:Michael|Michael]] 01:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | *I'm sorry, but who would hump a moogle? That's kinda a little ''too'' out there. --[[User:Michael|Michael]] 01:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
**probably someone doing a google search for "Mog XXX" ;-) --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 07:44, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | **probably someone doing a google search for "Mog XXX" ;-) --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 07:44, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | *Point of grammar: shouldn't it be "Moogle Fertility"? Moogle Infertility would imply that they are unable to have children with humans. --[[User:Celiose|Celiose]] 12:56, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | **You skipped a syllable, Travis :-p It's in'''ter'''fertility. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 13:35, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | *Why can't we just say it was magic like what mommy and daddy told me about the birds and the bees? --[[User:Michael|Michael]] 14:26, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | **I'm with you on that one, Mike. --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 14:33, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | ***For the record: All I wrote was that moogles and humans are cross-fertile, a statement which is supported by in-story precedent. I'm not responsible for the places Adam and Mike chose to take that statement within their own twisted little minds. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 15:27, 31 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | ****mang they didn't take it anywhere. the article says moogles and humans can have offspring. that's just fucken gross. i'm kind of glad i missed the "in-story precedent" --[[User:JD|JD]] 01:05, 2 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:05, 2 September 2006
Moogle Interfertility
ew tmi --Xstryker 14:16, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
- I'm sorry, but who would hump a moogle? That's kinda a little too out there. --Michael 01:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- probably someone doing a google search for "Mog XXX" ;-) --Xstryker 07:44, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- Point of grammar: shouldn't it be "Moogle Fertility"? Moogle Infertility would imply that they are unable to have children with humans. --Celiose 12:56, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- You skipped a syllable, Travis :-p It's interfertility. --Scen 13:35, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- Why can't we just say it was magic like what mommy and daddy told me about the birds and the bees? --Michael 14:26, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- I'm with you on that one, Mike. --Xstryker 14:33, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- For the record: All I wrote was that moogles and humans are cross-fertile, a statement which is supported by in-story precedent. I'm not responsible for the places Adam and Mike chose to take that statement within their own twisted little minds. --Scen 15:27, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- mang they didn't take it anywhere. the article says moogles and humans can have offspring. that's just fucken gross. i'm kind of glad i missed the "in-story precedent" --JD 01:05, 2 September 2006 (CDT)
- For the record: All I wrote was that moogles and humans are cross-fertile, a statement which is supported by in-story precedent. I'm not responsible for the places Adam and Mike chose to take that statement within their own twisted little minds. --Scen 15:27, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
- I'm with you on that one, Mike. --Xstryker 14:33, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
