Difference between revisions of "Talk:Xsian"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
**Because the wiki must stay USEFUL!!! --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 12:40, 7 August 2006 (CDT) | **Because the wiki must stay USEFUL!!! --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 12:40, 7 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
*I like that idea, the Meta section at the bottom. Travis? --[[User:Nick|Nick]] 13:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT) | *I like that idea, the Meta section at the bottom. Travis? --[[User:Nick|Nick]] 13:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ***Okay, I really don't like the meta in a story article. I'm going to extricate the OOC references. The wiki can be useful without breaking character. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 17:59, 14 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 14 August 2006
I wonder: for the purposes of this wiki, should we really be describing certain story elements according to their real-world equivalents? It kinda strikes me as an OOC aside in this entry, and if you remove the stuff about "Korean, Japanese," etc., I think people would still get the idea from the story elements you've listed below. Just a thought. Because the wiki must stay PURE!!! --Nick 08:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- "Because the wiki must stay PURE!!!" qft --Scen 08:26, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- You could put it in a Meta section at the bottom. --Xstryker 12:39, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- Because the wiki must stay USEFUL!!! --Xstryker 12:40, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- I like that idea, the Meta section at the bottom. Travis? --Nick 13:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- Okay, I really don't like the meta in a story article. I'm going to extricate the OOC references. The wiki can be useful without breaking character. --Scen 17:59, 14 August 2006 (CDT)
