Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sorceress Knight"
m (Talk:Knight moved to Talk:Sorceress Knight: For clarity's sake.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I'd do it, but I r dum and have no idea how. --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 05:28, 25 October 2006 (CDT) | ::I'd do it, but I r dum and have no idea how. --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 05:28, 25 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::I'd be happy to like I did for Acacia but I wouldn't know what articles to link it to. Maybe if Matt wrote an article on the guardian knights (or is there already an article on the square table?) that'd be a start. --[[User:JD|JD]] 10:17, 25 October 2006 (CDT) | :::I'd be happy to like I did for Acacia but I wouldn't know what articles to link it to. Maybe if Matt wrote an article on the guardian knights (or is there already an article on the square table?) that'd be a start. --[[User:JD|JD]] 10:17, 25 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I went ahead and just moved it to a new title so folks don't get confused. Not sure why I didn't do this before, I'm just lazy. --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 01:34, 3 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:34, 3 May 2009
This might benefit from a parenthetical qualifier or something to distinguish them from the multitudes of other types of Knights in the Kupopolis universe.--Celiose 18:00, 24 October 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe one o them, how you say, dis-ambulance-ation pagers... --Scen 18:04, 24 October 2006 (CDT)
- I'd do it, but I r dum and have no idea how. --Aurora 05:28, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
- I'd be happy to like I did for Acacia but I wouldn't know what articles to link it to. Maybe if Matt wrote an article on the guardian knights (or is there already an article on the square table?) that'd be a start. --JD 10:17, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
- I'd do it, but I r dum and have no idea how. --Aurora 05:28, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
I went ahead and just moved it to a new title so folks don't get confused. Not sure why I didn't do this before, I'm just lazy. --Aurora 01:34, 3 May 2009 (PDT)
