Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mace Merthor"
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not named after MaceScen? --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 23:14, 24 September 2006 (CDT) | Not named after MaceScen? --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 23:14, 24 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | :Nope. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 11:32, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::Although I could make it so, if I ret-conned in his middle name being "Scenograf". --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 12:21, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | *Your AOL handle was MaceScen when you debuted the character. --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 15:30, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | **... And it's still MaceScen! So? --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 18:05, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | ***I think his point is that the screen name predates the character. Your using "mace" as a character name predates the screen name though, if I'm not remembering wrong. I'm pretty sure you wrote about a troll or an ogre or something named Mace in the Scribe Shack during Northlands. --[[User:JD|JD]] 18:14, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | ****Well, it has been a while since both Northlands and MM's intro, but yes I do recall a Warcraftian reject name of Mace appearing in the oh-so-silly scribe shack posts back in the day. There's no connection between the screenname, the Kupop character and the scribe shack character though. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 18:29, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | *****I was hoping for some big, earth-shattering arc which would draw them all together. --[[User:JD|JD]] 18:33, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | So he doesn't get to be in the category "Characters named for their writer"? He'll be so sad.--[[User:Celiose|Celiose]] 19:06, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | How about Iteration X can that go in. --[[User:JD|JD]] 19:55, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Very well. I guess you just like Maces. --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 20:33, 25 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | :Well, unless you disapprove and insist it go back in the category. --[[User:Scen|Scen]] 20:37, 25 September 2006 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 01:37, 26 September 2006
Not named after MaceScen? --Xstryker 23:14, 24 September 2006 (CDT)
- Nope. --Scen 11:32, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- Although I could make it so, if I ret-conned in his middle name being "Scenograf". --Scen 12:21, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- Your AOL handle was MaceScen when you debuted the character. --Xstryker 15:30, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- ... And it's still MaceScen! So? --Scen 18:05, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- I think his point is that the screen name predates the character. Your using "mace" as a character name predates the screen name though, if I'm not remembering wrong. I'm pretty sure you wrote about a troll or an ogre or something named Mace in the Scribe Shack during Northlands. --JD 18:14, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- Well, it has been a while since both Northlands and MM's intro, but yes I do recall a Warcraftian reject name of Mace appearing in the oh-so-silly scribe shack posts back in the day. There's no connection between the screenname, the Kupop character and the scribe shack character though. --Scen 18:29, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- I was hoping for some big, earth-shattering arc which would draw them all together. --JD 18:33, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- Well, it has been a while since both Northlands and MM's intro, but yes I do recall a Warcraftian reject name of Mace appearing in the oh-so-silly scribe shack posts back in the day. There's no connection between the screenname, the Kupop character and the scribe shack character though. --Scen 18:29, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- I think his point is that the screen name predates the character. Your using "mace" as a character name predates the screen name though, if I'm not remembering wrong. I'm pretty sure you wrote about a troll or an ogre or something named Mace in the Scribe Shack during Northlands. --JD 18:14, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- ... And it's still MaceScen! So? --Scen 18:05, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
So he doesn't get to be in the category "Characters named for their writer"? He'll be so sad.--Celiose 19:06, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
How about Iteration X can that go in. --JD 19:55, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
Very well. I guess you just like Maces. --Xstryker 20:33, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
- Well, unless you disapprove and insist it go back in the category. --Scen 20:37, 25 September 2006 (CDT)