Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Fascist Pact"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This really is Tex's call, but I did leave GATO open as a category because it is somewhat useful to see who belonged even to alliances that are no longer around and kicking anymore. [[User:Scen|Scen]] 23:55, 4 August 2006 (CDT) | :This really is Tex's call, but I did leave GATO open as a category because it is somewhat useful to see who belonged even to alliances that are no longer around and kicking anymore. [[User:Scen|Scen]] 23:55, 4 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Thanks for the heads up... I am going to Category:GATO like crazy now... sorry for the whole hegemony thing, that was because I thought it still applied and because I thought you didn't want a GATO category. [[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 10:24, 5 August 2006 (CDT) | ::Thanks for the heads up... I am going to Category:GATO like crazy now... sorry for the whole hegemony thing, that was because I thought it still applied and because I thought you didn't want a GATO category. [[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 10:24, 5 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I'll follow precedent and leave it here. --[[User:Tex|Tex]] 11:20, 5 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 5 August 2006
Tex, do you want to have this category for former Pact members, or does the fact that the Pact is now defunct make this category irrelevant?--Xstryker 20:21, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
- This really is Tex's call, but I did leave GATO open as a category because it is somewhat useful to see who belonged even to alliances that are no longer around and kicking anymore. Scen 23:55, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
- Thanks for the heads up... I am going to Category:GATO like crazy now... sorry for the whole hegemony thing, that was because I thought it still applied and because I thought you didn't want a GATO category. Xstryker 10:24, 5 August 2006 (CDT)
- I'll follow precedent and leave it here. --Tex 11:20, 5 August 2006 (CDT)
