Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Characters named after their writer"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*You're no fun. --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 13:59, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | *You're no fun. --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 13:59, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
*Well, assuming I decide to create a character profile for Aurora (I'm still debating it), she should be on there too (she's not exactly derelict). --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 23:30, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | *Well, assuming I decide to create a character profile for Aurora (I'm still debating it), she should be on there too (she's not exactly derelict). --[[User:Aurora|Aurora]] 23:30, 29 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | **Wait, I thought Chrysalis was Aurora... --[[User:Xstryker|Xstryker]] 07:42, 30 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 30 August 2006
... Is this category even necessary? I mean, if you guys feel you need it that's fine by me, but given that all but one of these characters are derelict I wonder if this is really helpful. --Scen 12:24, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
- You're no fun. --Xstryker 13:59, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
- Well, assuming I decide to create a character profile for Aurora (I'm still debating it), she should be on there too (she's not exactly derelict). --Aurora 23:30, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
- Wait, I thought Chrysalis was Aurora... --Xstryker 07:42, 30 August 2006 (CDT)
